Sony and Samsung have released feature-packed Android phones that push the boundaries of productivity, but which one is best for you?
When it comes to Android smartphones, the two biggest names in the business are Samsung and Sony. They’ve both gone all out this year with their flagship phones, which are uncompromising beasts with just about every feature you can imagine.
However, there are still some significant differences between the two, and each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Based on our review of the Galaxy S22 Ultra and the specifications announced for the Sony Xperia 1 IV, this article breaks down each key area to see which ones come out on top.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is without a doubt a big boy. With a screen that measures 6.8 inches and weighs 229g, it’s actually quite difficult to use it with one hand due to its bulkiness.
There are some notable improvements over its predecessors here, such as a more fingerprint-resistant satin back and the introduction of an integrated S-Pen stylus, but it still feels a little boxy. It’s not only big; it’s also rugged, with an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, armored aluminum on the sides, and Gorilla Glass Victus+ front and back.
If the Sony Xperia 1 IV has a fairly familiar design, it’s because you’ve seen it before; it is almost identical to the Sony Xperia 1 III.
Although that’s not necessarily a bad thing. We particularly like the fact that Sony has ditched a few recent trends in line with the 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable MicroSD storage, though the 21:9 aspect ratio screen will still divide users as it could be perfect for films, but he may feel a little cramped in other contexts. The Xperia 1 IV is IP 65/68 rated.
The screen is the strength of both of these smartphones, so if watching movies or playing games is your top priority, choosing between the two can be difficult.
The S22 Ultra’s screen is fantastic, with variable refresh rates from 1Hz to 120Hz for smooth visuals, 240Hz touch sampling rates for responsive gaming, gorgeous HDR chops, and crisp 1440p resolution. Even the kind of lush nature documentaries that are better suited to big TV screens still seem to be quite riveting.
With all the impressive specs, the S22 Ultra Xperia 1 IV offers something you won’t find anywhere else, namely a 4K OLED HDR display. The display on the Xperia 1 II is very impressive, so we hope it continues like this; however, we’re just keeping our fingers crossed that adaptive brightness is a bit better this time around.
Camera setup The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an impressive number of megapixels: a 108MP wide-angle camera, a 10MP periscope telephoto lens with 10x optical zoom, a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, and a 12MP telephoto lens. ultra-wide megapixel lens.
This array makes it one of the best camera phones out there, with shots from every lens looking incredibly sharp and detailed. There is a lot of focus on zoom, and this is where the S22 Ultra really excels at its competition. Take a look at the selection of shots below to see the cameras in action:
Meanwhile, it seems that the cameras have received the biggest update in the new Sony phone. While there are still three 12-megapixel sensors on the back, a lot of things have changed; The zoom lens now has an 85-125mm optical zoom, while all three sensors now have Sony’s excellent Eye AF and subject tracking, as well as the ability to shoot 4K HDR video at 120fps. We need to test it before reaching a verdict, but early signs are encouraging.
Both of these phones are also powerful phones that use one of the most powerful Android processors. There are two variants of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, one with Exynos 2200 (which is sold in Europe) and one with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (which is sold in many other countries). You can see the benchmark performance below: CPU scores measured by Geekbench and GPU scores measured by 3D Mark.
In our experience with the Exynos 2200 S22 Ultra version, we found it to run very fast and rarely get hot, even when running demanding games like Geshin Impact. However, we also encountered some annoying software bugs while using the phone, which we hope have been fixed since the initial launch but were a concern nonetheless.
We haven’t tried the Xperia 1 IV in its tests yet, but we expect the same high standards of performance from it – but it’s only by trying out and running various day-to-day applications on the device that we can determine its true abilities.
Both phones have a beefy 5,000mAh battery, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll deliver the same level of endurance.
When we used the S22 Ultra as our main smartphone, we found it to have “good, but not groundbreaking” battery life. By keeping it on the highest settings and using it regularly, we found that it almost helped us through the day, but without much headroom. Although it doesn’t come with a charger, it does support 45W fast charging, which will fully charge the battery in about an hour.
The Xperia IV’s battery is 500mAh larger than its predecessor, so we’re expecting some modest performance improvements. That said, we were already pretty happy with the Xperia 1 III’s battery, which we found to usually give us 10-15% headroom for the rest of the day. This phone does not come with a charger or even a cable, but the maximum fast charging power is 30W.
We haven’t done a full and thorough review of the Sony Xperia 1 IV yet, so we can’t make a definitive verdict. However, based on what we know so far, in addition to our firsthand experience with the Galaxy S22 Ultra, it’s clear that this is going to be a tough choice.
When it comes to performance, screen, or battery, there may not be much difference between the two, but the two key elements that matter may be design and the camera.
The first of these is a matter of personal taste, and while many buyers may be attracted by the practical touches of the Xperia 1 IV, they may also be put off by its odd shape. However, very importantly, it will have to improve its game significantly compared to the S22 Ultra when it comes to the camera if it is to be seen as a better choice.