On Wednesday, a federal appeals court overturned President Joe Biden’s nationwide vaccine ban on healthcare workers, instead blocking the requirement in certain states and creating the potential for patchwork across the country.
The New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals decision retained the preliminary injunction against 14 states that collectively filed a lawsuit in Louisiana federal court. This changed the November 30 ruling of US District Judge Terry Doughty, who initially applied his ruling nationwide.
A separate preliminary injunction against appeal in the 8th U.S. District Court of Appeals in St. Louis extends to 10 additional states. This means that the vaccine requirement for Medicare and Medicaid providers is blocked by courts in about half of the states, but not the other half.
“This vaccine rule is a very important issue that is currently being discussed throughout the country. His final approval would benefit from “broadcasting competing opinions” in our sister constituencies, “the ruling of three 5th Circuit judges reads.
This is a rule published November 5 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid that applies to a wide range of health care providers receiving federal Medicare or Medicaid funding. Their workers were expected to receive their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine by December 6 and be fully vaccinated by January 4. The vaccine was planned to affect more than 17 million workers in approximately 76,000 health care facilities, as well as home health care providers.
Not a Modern Healthcare subscriber? Register Today.
On December 2, the agency said it would not enforce the vaccine rule while the injunctions were in place. It was not immediately clear on Wednesday whether the agency would continue to suspend the rule for all states or if it would seek to promote it in states that are no longer subject to injunctions.
About 85% of the country’s adult population has already received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. But Biden says his various assignments to vaccinate employees are an important step towards improving vaccination rates and containing the virus outbreak that has killed about 800,000 people in the United States.
Courts that blocked the powers of medical professionals, federal contractors, and midsize and large businesses all said the Biden administration likely exceeded executive powers prescribed by law. The administration continues to argue that this has a sound legal basis.
In support of Doughty’s injunction against the states that have sued, the 5th Circuit said it was likely that opponents of the mandate to vaccinate health care workers would prevail as the case proceeds in the courts. However, the commission also said there were significant differences between the healthcare vaccine mandate and another vaccine mandate, previously blocked in a separate decree backed by the 5th District that extended to all businesses that employ more than 100 people.
Among the main differences, according to the court, is that “targeted healthcare facilities, especially nursing homes, pose the greatest risk of COVID-19.”
The 5th Circuit ruling on Wednesday was rendered by Judge Leslie Southwick, who was appointed to court by President George W. Bush; and James Graves and Gregg Costa, both nominated by President Barack Obama.
The 5th Circuit decision blocks vaccination powers for healthcare professionals in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia. A separate case pending in the 8th District blocks the mandate in Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.
Also on Wednesday, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati said that a panel of three judges – not the entire court – will rule to challenge the Biden administration’s mandate that all private employers with at least 100 employees require them to were vaccinated. or wear masks and have weekly tests.
This decision is a victory for the Biden administration, which has resisted attempts to involve all the judges of the panel in the case. Eleven of the 16 full-time judges in the 6th Circuit were appointed by Republicans.
Voting in the 6th arrondissement was divided: eight judges wanted the entire panel to hear the case, and eight remained with three judges. Judge Karen Nelson Moore wrote that a panel of three judges has already devoted time to the case, and now the transition “will undermine our normal process.”
Chief Justice Jeffrey Sutton disagreed, arguing with dissent: “There is something that needs to be said to make every effort, especially when it comes to handling stopping motion.” In his disagreement, he set out a case against the administration’s authority to issue a mandate.
At least for now, the previous 5th District ruling remains in effect, and the broader mandate to vaccinate businesses has been suspended across the country. The federal government has demanded that this order be canceled. Determining which judges will decide this issue can pave the way for a decision on this issue.