Today, Trump stepped down and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the law.Florida’s Big Tech Bill”A subtle veiled test to appease Trump’s Twitter and Facebook grip. And also money in the bank for Big Tech warrior Ron DeSantis.
The bill puts a bit of hope ahead of Trump, with a provision that he (or others) could ask social media companies for up to $ 100,000, and guarantees that political candidates get an automatic space on social media platforms if they wish. It’s a punch as much as any of Trump’s own attempts to get on Twitter through surrogates, making it a useless waste of taxpayer resources in Florida – even perhaps a gift to the world more wide since it could divert some of Trump’s attention by fueling the anger of his followers as he mutates into an unproductive battle.
DeSantis is selling this as a campaign to protect “true Floridians throughout Sunshine State” from the “Silicon Valley elite,” but the meaningless text it is in fact the politicians who do themselves a favor. Florida now believes that all social media companies should leave all political candidates on their platforms, no matter if they violate the rules. Florida also thinks it can now fine social media, without a base, $ 250,000 per day for deplatforming a candidate for state office and $ 25,000 for deplatforming candidates for “other offices.” If the platforms have violated the new Florida rule, the prohibited or deformed person can sue for damages of up to $ 100,000, as well as actual damages and punitive damages. Trump’s demand is probably TBA on his blog.
The bill also introduces a major new rule that would protect media that promotes conservatism and misinformation, forcing social media platforms to host them and prohibiting them from “prioritizing” certain outlets over others.
It does little to protect civilians from “censorship,” unless they register as political candidates, which racists have proven perfectly capable to do. Above all, however, it only poses a pain in the ass for a society to deform non-politicians. Order social media platforms to give rules a warning, show other users who have seen your post, and allow users to “opt-out” of the “shadow-banning algorithm.” They should also enforce the rules of moderation “in a uniform manner” – despite the fact that Facebook and Twitter have specifically made an exception for Donald Trump’s abuse for four years.
The act clearly clarifies Section 230, the fundamental rule governing social platforms, long despised by Republicans. Under section 2 (a), platforms are protected from being judged for good faith moderation of content that they consider “obscene, lascivious, lascivious, dirty, excessively violent, annoying, or otherwise objectionable, if the material is constitutionally protected. or not “. Section 2 (b) allows him to take any action to limit access to that content, which would include the removal of a habitual offender from the platform.
Section 230 makes no exceptions for politicians or celebrities or Donald Trump. In addition to Section 230, it doesn’t even explain why anyone can meet in a company that has a blanket “no shouting violent threats to customers” politically and always expect to be served.
Florida law is largely based on the argument that social media is the “new public square,” a specific phrase for First Amendment protections. So Florida seems to be protecting its bet on the hope that the Supreme Court will eventually decide that social partnerships are not primarily corporate, perhaps insinuating. a legal magazine of Section 230. No matter the outcome, it’s a win-win for Ron DeSantis.
There is also a provision that Florida may blacklist companies to secure government contracts if they are found to be violating antitrust laws — or even if an Attorney General believes he has “likely” violated antitrust law. The president of the Florida Republican Party introduced one just as awkward (now dead) bill in January, which would have specifically prevented Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Google and Apple from doing business with any Florida government entity due to perceived conservative censorship.
It makes as much sense encouraging people to go without masks and pack restaurants during a pandemic in a state full of the elderly. Or trying to dismantle social media because of Twitter verify in fact your lies.