Oil will flow through the controversial Line 3 pipeline on Friday, after years of litigation and resistance, which have arrested more than 900 people since construction began in November.
The pipeline’s owners, Canada’s Enbridge Energy, said in a statement. statement The 1,097-mile (1,765 km) pipeline was “largely completed” this week and could begin transporting oil from Canada through North Dakota and Minnesota to the company’s Wisconsin terminal. Vice President of the project said AP that most of the remaining work has been removed and that the pipeline should reach a maximum throughput of 760,000 barrels of tar sands per day by the end of this month. But there are still ways to prevent this from happening.…
Yet, Tthis moment marks a grim setback for pipeline resistancethat has inspired people all over the country. V Indigenous-led protests centered around lands critical to the Anisinaabe tribes, including vulnerable wetlands. Tar sands oil is incredibly difficult to remove in the event of a spill. The pipeline also block decades of additional use of fossil fuels, further destabilizing the climate. The oil that he will transport is especially dangerous, liberation 17% more carbon dioxide emissions than standard crude oil.
“Enbridge rushed to build this line before a federal court ruled on our appeals over the line, but people did: we believe the most expensive oil sands pipeline ever built in the US will be the last one.” Winona LaDuke, chief executive of Honor the Earth and one of the central figures opposing the pipeline, said in a statement praising the water defenders who fought the project.
While the assembly line can be mostly built physically, legally, Enbridge’s phrase “almost complete” is irrelevant here. Earlier this month, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources fined Enbridge $ 3.3 million for damaging a sensitive aquifer during pipeline construction back in January. The company continues to face possible legal action for violation from Clearwater County, Minnesota, where is the pipelinethat, according to the DPR, violated the law, which makes it a crime to change or appropriate state waters without proper permission. Meanwhile, appeals against construction permits for the pipeline in federal and tribal courts are still ongoing.
“There are still many unresolved issues,” said Monein Naismith, an attorney for Earthjustice who participated in the federal court. “This is not easy for a pipeline in any imagination. And this is not the first pipeline to do this – this is what Dakota Access did. They don’t allow any legal action to stop them from making money on this pipeline. ”
Claim against Dakota Access pIpelin, brought in by indigenous groups, is still going through federal court more than four years after the pipeline’s owner, Energy Transfer, began pushing oil through the pipeline.… Naismith explained that, as with Dakota Access, the pipeline company may not change the judge’s decision, but may change how the court will decide on the remedy in that case.
“If they were still building it, the solution would be to stop building,” Naismith said. “Now that it is in effect, we ask that it be corrected if it is found that the permit was obtained illegally and you should not be allowed to work in accordance with this permit. The only thing that really changed with Enbridge’s announcement was the question of whether the judge took our side and found that they had to go back and repeat the analysis, does the court force the conveyor to be turned off during the analysis?“
If Dakota Access is any indication, it can be tricky. A judge ordered the Dakota Access pipeline stop pumping oil last year after the discovery the company needed to redo a key pipeline permit. The Army Corps stated in April, although, that Energy Transfer was allowed to continue operating the pipeline while the company received new permission…
The Biden administration has made public its commitment to climate protection.… But in court and behind the scenes, this is took fossil fuel stance when it comes to Dakota Access and Line 3 pipelines… V The Army Corps’ decision to continue moving oil through the Dakota Access pipeline came just months after Biden announced on his first day that he was revocation of permits for Keystone pipelin…
Meanwhile, the Biden administration has also made every effort to defend line 3 in court… In June, the Ministry of Justice issued a brief on the claim filed by Earthjustice and others defending the resolution work in the Trump era and asking the court to reject any argument from environmental and indigenous groups and allow the pipeline to move forward.
In spite of in favor of oil pipelines, it is not too late for them to do something about Line 3, especially if Biden wants to prove he is serious about fighting climate change. With international climate negotiations approaching, pressure is growing on the administration to keep its promises.
“[The administration’s] the right to revoke this permit does not end just because the pipeline starts working, ”Naismith said. “Power exists by their own rules if they determine that they have missed something in the analysis that was conducted earlier. We are trying to point out to them that they missed a lot, including not talking about the impact of the tar sands pipeline on climate change. To say that you are serious about climate change and admit it is quite controversial in terms of emissions. “