Falcon and the winter soldier it could be in the rearview mirror for Marvel and Disney as the company turn your eyes to Loki, but the talk surrounding the show returned to the forefront of fandom last night after a new interview with Captain America himself, Anthony Mackie. But the fury surrounding Mackie’s answers to a timely question points to her frustration in the wrong direction.
As a part of Variety Awards Circuit podcast series, Mackie discussed the timeliness of his ascension to the mantle of Captain America in Falcon and the winter soldierThe finale, however, was also asked about the series ’portrayal of the relationship between Sam Wilson and Sebastian Stan’s Bucky Barnes, and why the show hadn’t presented the duo’s relationship as more than sympathetic.
“So many things are twisted and tangled.” There are so many things that people stop using their own devices to make themselves relevant and rational, ”Mackie said when asked to play their relationship as male friends, rather than potentially romantic. idea that two guys are friends and they fall in love in 2021 is a problem because of the exploitation of homosexuality.Before he was the guy he can be friends with, we can go through, and he was great.You will always meet your friends at the bar, you know. You can’t do that anymore, because something as pure and beautiful as homosexuality has been exploited by people trying to rationalize. “
“So something that has always been very important to me shows a sensitive male figure. There’s nothing more masculine than being a superhero and flying around and beating people up,” Mackie continued. “But there’s nothing more sensitive than having emotional conversations and a close spiritual friendship with someone you love and love.”
Comments were also circulated on social media when the business shared Mackie’s response in a series of threaded tweets. In doing so, many of Mackie’s points about his aversion to discussing fandom topics such as the expedition and his commentary on the exploitation of querness at the corporate level were presented in isolation, leading to commentators that they chose excerpts from Mackie’s response to dunk on.
Audiences looking for a weirder representation from Marvel’s film and television production have more than a right to be annoyed by Mackie’s response, given the poor approach of the study to include prominent LGBTQIA characters in more than a decade of release so far. And, even read at the most diplomatic point, Mackie’s response is perhaps awkward at best, and contempt for real concern and disappointment from the public at stake. But at the same time, it’s clear that the actor isn’t comfortable answering questions about his character’s fandom interpretation – “I try to stay away from fan things,” Mackie says in preparation for the question about the show’s lack of serenity in the podcast, “the fandom is a very dangerous place, so I just let it be what it is and continue to do so”.
Let her be her answer should being goofy is a different question. The push for larger conversations around a different representation in tentpole franchises like the Marvel Cinematic Universe or Star Wars and other myriads of Hollywood blockbusters have been a process going on for years now. It’s a point where, perhaps, actors – or more specifically their PR agents – should be aware that critics and journalists will want them to address questions about representation, strange or otherwise, so they should be ready to formulate a response to those inquiries. Even if this answer is as simple as “it’s not something I say a word to, but there should be more and more representation in our media to reflect the society in which we live,” it will be better than the kind of hot water that Mackie found himself landing as a trending topic on Twitter last night.
Speaking of Star Wars, case in point: the story of John Boyega and Oscar Isaac discussing the potential for their sequel trilogy characters Finn and Poe Dameron to be in a relationship together. Both were favoring the thrust, but without communication about the actuality of his characters which are strange to anyone he did having control over this type of creative decision could come and go (in their case Rise of Skywalker director JJ Abrams, which closes the possibility in preparation for the release of the film, to much disappointment).
Yet despite Mackie’s lack of preparation to launch the critique – a valid critique of both Falcon and Marvel’s larger production – the resulting fury for him feels like a misguided rage, especially considering the way Variety embodied Mackie’s response on social media, a decision that ended in maximum frustration at the actor himself. The real question is not whether we should keep these massive shows and films to completion for their occasional platitudes on a different representation, strange or otherwise, but to point those questions at the people who effectively control the production of these studies: writers, directors, and producers. Particularly in an institution like Marvel Studios, where the highest levels of management have a very public face in the form of Kevin Feige, the role of the producers as architects of these forward-looking films and shows is a ‘ idea that the public already knows.
After all, it’s not just people who get to make creative decisions like whether or not to portray a previously ambiguous character as queer, or frame a moment between two characters with homoromantic nuances. In FalconIn particular the case, it is the people who have a history of teasing the odds of the show of strange representation in the first place, and so it is the people who should be held to the task when that teasing turns out to be nothing but that. Malcolm Spellman, one of the show’s lead writers and now a co-writer on the Mackie-starring Captain America 4, he told the press and fans that they should “just watch …” when asked about the theories that Bucky Barnes could be portrayed in Falcon and the winter soldier as bisexual in an interview with NME-Just for the viewer to be rewarded with nothing. The aforementioned Kevin Feige, who also has producer credits in Falcon as he does more on The release of Marvel Studios, has a history of offering different answers to “wait and see” incidents of the lack of different Marvel-like characters in preparation for Avengers: Endgame when he said the fans had a right to see himself in Marvel movies, only to step back and say that he I didn’t think it would be such a big deal that fans would be shocked that Endgame gave the MCU its first strange explicit character in the form of a minor cameo by director Joe Russo.
It is clear that despite what feels like years of promise that change is coming on this front (the first strange relationship on screen and kiss in a Marvel movie is destined to come in Chloé Zhao The Eternal later this year, and Tessa Thompson’s Valkyrie she will be portrayed as a bisexual woman in Taika Waititi Thor: Love is Thunder the following year), the lack of strange representation is still a continuing problem at Marvel Studios‘ movies and shows. Fans have every right to be frustrated by this issue, as long as it persists, and journalists should hold the people in the studio responsible for answering why their material smokes when they do.
But people who need tor be held accountable on this issue, and others like it, are not necessarily people like Mackie-actors who can at most lend support to those frustrations and hopes for positive change. Instead these concerns have to be addressed by people who actually have them port change them. We are talking about the architects of a system that has so far failed to highlight strange characters., in studios like Disney, such as Spellman and Feige. Maybe especially in a studio like Disney, which has a long history of struggle to present LGBTQIA + characters in the forefront of their stories.
Wondering where our RSS feed went? You can choose the new one here.