The Islamic State’s propaganda arm used Amazon Web Services to host extremist content, according to the statement. Washington Post… Nida-e-Haqq, the group’s media arm, posted messages in Urdu on the website, including the recent suicide bombing in Kabul, which killed 170 people. Because Amazon’s policy prohibits customers from using its services to incite violence and terror, the company closed the website after mail warned him of its existence.
A website shut down by Amazon provided content for the Nida-e-Haqq app, which recently featured an image of a Kabul terrorist wrapped in a suicide vest. It is currently password protected and unavailable for viewing, but has been active since at least April, based on online domain records. mail saw. Amazon spokesman Casey McGee told the publication in a statement, “(F) following investigation, we disabled the website associated with this application because it violated the AWS Acceptable Use Policy.”
Taliban and extremist content is the latest social media problem, and obviously hosting services like Amazon have to contend with. The organization used services such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and WhatsApp to spread its message, and now the websites must decide if they need to update their policies on how to deal with Taliban content and make sure their existing rules of violence and terror is carried out properly.
Amazon did not reveal how Nida-e-Haqq managed to avoid detection for at least four months, when the company did not even try to hide what content it was hosting, but it is possible that the company simply did not know the site existed. As mail Amazon may not have control over its customers’ content, he said, relying instead on the complaints it receives.
Back in January, the company suspended Parler’s AWS hosting service after it found several posts on the social network that “clearly encourage and incite violence.” Parler sued Amazon, alleging antitrust violations, but the company said it sent the website several warnings about violent posting on its platform prior to deleting it. The judge ultimately rejected Parler’s attempt to force AWS to restore its services, citing the danger posed by “inflammatory rhetoric” on the social network.
All Engadget recommended products are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories contain affiliate links. If you buy something from one of these links, we may receive an affiliate commission.