Business

Musk’s SpaceX Starship complex, high risk

Billionaire American entrepreneur Jeff Bezos walks with Blue Origin president and CEO Bob Smith after Bezos flew on the company’s inaugural flight to the shores of space, in the nearby city of Van Horn, Texas, July 20 2021 US.

Joe Skipper | Reuters

Jeff Bezos’ space company remains on the offensive criticizing NASA’s decision to award Elon Musk’s SpaceX with the only contract to build a vehicle to land astronauts on the moon, despite the government’s denial last week the Blue Origin protest.

In an infographic posted on the Blue Origin site and viewed Wednesday, the company called SpaceX with Starship to transport NASA astronauts to the lunar surface an “immensely complex and high-risk” approach. Blue Origin refers to a criticism that NASA officials have made in evaluating Starship for the luner lander program.

“There are an unprecedented number of technologies, developments and operations that have never been done before for Starship to land on the Moon,” Blue Origin wrote.

Last Friday, the U.S. Government’s Accountability Office denied NASA’s Blue Origin protest awarding SpaceX with a $ 2.9 billion contract in the Human Landing System program. In three one page documents, Blue Origin described NASA’s decision as “wrong for America’s leadership in space” and reiterated its previous criticism that the space agency “has faced inconsistent and unfair competition” – even if the congressional watchdog said NASA didn’t.

“NASA has made a faulty acquisition and has ignored the significant risks of a single-vendor model,” Blue Origin wrote.

The company wants NASA to award a second contract in the original framework of the acquisition of the Human Landing System. While NASA has said it will offer future contracts under HLS through lunar exploration transportation service awards, these contracts are expected to cost $ 45 million or less each.

Criticism of Starship

The Starship SN15 shuttle prototype launches from Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX

The Starship SN15 rocket prototype hit the company’s landing on May 5, 2021, in Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX

Blue Origin made additional technical comparisons, noting that SpaceX’s plan requires more than 10 Starship launches to land once on the moon and must be refueled into orbit, “a process that has never been done before.”

Finally, Blue Origin compared the height of the astronaut’s exit doors. The Starship exit is 126 meters from the ground, and conceptually uses an elevator to bring the astronauts to the surface, while the Blue Origin lander is 32 meters from the ground and requires the crew to leave a long ladder.

A comparison that Blue Origin did not make was in terms of cost. NASA cited cost as a major factor in its decision to select only one winner in the Human Landing System, because Congress has allocated to the agency a fraction of its requested budget for the program. SpaceX offered $ 2.9 billion, while Blue Origin was roughly double that to $ 5.99 billion.

In the first round of Human Landing System contracts, NASA distributed nearly $ 1 billion in prizes for concept development – with SpaceX receiving $ 135 million, Dynetics receiving $ 253 million and Blue Origin receiving 579 million dollars.

Lander of Blue Origin

A crew of the crew’s lander vehicle at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in August 2020.

Origin Turchina


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button