Critics of James Cameron’s sequel

Avatar: Path of Water

Credit: Disney Co.

James Cameron’s long-awaited sequel to 2009’s Avatar hits theaters this weekend and has both charmed and enraged critics.

Disney At over three hours long, Avatar: The Way of Water is considered a terrific film, rated Fresh by Rotten Tomatoes. But its storytelling is thin and, like the original, doesn’t hold up to Cameron’s lofty technical ambitions, several critics have said.

The Way of Water follows Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), who are now the parents of four Na’vi children. The family is expelled from their forest home when the humans return to re-colonize parts of Pandora.

Read more: ‘Avatar: The Way of Water’ Could Earn $175 Million In Its Opening Weekend

Critics are adamant that audiences should watch The Way of the Water on the biggest possible screen, praising the film for its “you won’t believe it’s a computer” visuals and bombastic sound design.

But the film’s long running time was a drawback for many, who found that Cameron’s script was too thin to justify three hours in theaters.

Here’s what critics thought of Avatar: The Way of Water ahead of its Friday release.

Eric Francisco, Inverse

Avatar: Path of Water

Credit: Disney Co.

Charlotte O’Sullivan, Evening Standard

Wenley Ma,

For those who returned to the theater again and again to see Avatar on the big screen ten years ago, The Way of the Water will seem “bright and exciting.”

For those who found the first movie too long and narrow in plot, The Way of the Water won’t do much to help you fall in love with Pandora’s world.

“This sequel will repeat your experience of the first one,” Wenlei Ma wrote in her review of the film for

Avatar: Path of Water

Credit: Disney Co.

Justin Chang, Los Angeles Times

Avatar: Path of Water

Courtesy of Disney Co.

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button